Stage 5; Estimating the risk
Revision as of 20:55, 18 December 2022 by Bosmana fem (talk | contribs)
Checklist 3: Evaluating the quality of evidence (for information tables) | |
---|---|
Quality of evidence = confidence in information; design, quality and other factors assessed and judged on consistency, relevance and validity. Grade: good, satisfactory, unsatisfactor | Examples of types of information/evidence |
Good Further research unlikely to change confidence in information. | * Peer-reviewed published studies where design and analysis reduce bias, e.g. systematic reviews, randomised control trials, outbreak reports using analytical epidemiology
|
Satisfactory
Further research likely to have impact on confidence of information and may change assessment. || * Non-peer-reviewed published studies/reports
| |
Unsatisfactory
|