Difference between revisions of "Ascertainment Bias"

From
Jump to: navigation, search
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
=Case ascertainment (surveillance) bias=
 +
This happens when there is more intense surveillance/ screening for the outcome among exposed than among unexposed.
  
 +
Example: let's assume that the objective of a case-control study is to assess if a history of past trauma is a risk factor for AS (ankylosing spondylitis). Cases of AS are compared with a random sample of the general population with regard to a history of past trauma. Having a history of trauma, which increases the likelihood of having X-ray investigations, will lead to a higher likelihood of a diagnosis of AS in persons with this trauma history than in the general population. Therefore the proportion of AS cases with a history of past trauma is higher among cases, and the related odds ratio (OR) will be overestimated.
  
 
[[Category:Selection bias and case-control studies]]
 
[[Category:Selection bias and case-control studies]]

Revision as of 13:41, 12 April 2023

Case ascertainment (surveillance) bias

This happens when there is more intense surveillance/ screening for the outcome among exposed than among unexposed.

Example: let's assume that the objective of a case-control study is to assess if a history of past trauma is a risk factor for AS (ankylosing spondylitis). Cases of AS are compared with a random sample of the general population with regard to a history of past trauma. Having a history of trauma, which increases the likelihood of having X-ray investigations, will lead to a higher likelihood of a diagnosis of AS in persons with this trauma history than in the general population. Therefore the proportion of AS cases with a history of past trauma is higher among cases, and the related odds ratio (OR) will be overestimated.

Contributors