Stage 5; Estimating the risk: Difference between revisions
Bosmana fem (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{| class="wikitable" |- ! Checklist 3: Evaluating the quality of evidence (for information tables) |- | Quality of evidence = confidence in information; design, quality and ot...") |
Bosmana fem (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Once the quality of evidence has been assessed, the completed information table is then used to assess the risk posed by the threat using the risk assessment algorithms. Two approaches are presented; the first option combines probability and impact into a single algorithm resulting in a single overall risk level, whilst the second assesses probability and impact separately. Both approaches use all the available information collected in the respective table to assess the level of risk and aid in identifying gaps in knowledge. It may be difficult to rapidly assess a potential threat where some information necessary to inform the risk process is unknown. This uncertainty is documented and managed in the algorithms by adopting a precautionary approach and moving through the algorithm to a higher level of risk. | |||
The combined approach has the advantage of greater simplicity. However, using separate algorithms to assess probability and impact avoids over-simplification. It provides a more accurate assessment in situations with a high probability of low-impact disease or a low probability of high-impact disease. The resulting individual risk levels can be combined into a single overall risk level using the risk ranking matrix. Preferences of those doing the rapid risk assessment and the circumstances of the incident will determine which option is used. | |||
The chosen approach should be applied to the general population and then repeated for those groups at increased risk of infection, in whom the risk may differ. It should be noted that the rapid risk assessment may change over time in light of new information or events and should be updated accordingly. | |||
[[File:RRAMatrix.png|600px|frameless|center]] | |||
=References= | |||
Entire text copied from: | |||
* European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Operational guidance on rapid risk assessment methodology. Stockholm: ECDC; 2011. ISBN 978-92-9193-306-8 doi 10.2900/57509 | |||
[[Category:Rapid Risk Assessment]] | |||
Latest revision as of 10:39, 24 March 2023
Once the quality of evidence has been assessed, the completed information table is then used to assess the risk posed by the threat using the risk assessment algorithms. Two approaches are presented; the first option combines probability and impact into a single algorithm resulting in a single overall risk level, whilst the second assesses probability and impact separately. Both approaches use all the available information collected in the respective table to assess the level of risk and aid in identifying gaps in knowledge. It may be difficult to rapidly assess a potential threat where some information necessary to inform the risk process is unknown. This uncertainty is documented and managed in the algorithms by adopting a precautionary approach and moving through the algorithm to a higher level of risk.
The combined approach has the advantage of greater simplicity. However, using separate algorithms to assess probability and impact avoids over-simplification. It provides a more accurate assessment in situations with a high probability of low-impact disease or a low probability of high-impact disease. The resulting individual risk levels can be combined into a single overall risk level using the risk ranking matrix. Preferences of those doing the rapid risk assessment and the circumstances of the incident will determine which option is used.
The chosen approach should be applied to the general population and then repeated for those groups at increased risk of infection, in whom the risk may differ. It should be noted that the rapid risk assessment may change over time in light of new information or events and should be updated accordingly.
References
Entire text copied from:
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Operational guidance on rapid risk assessment methodology. Stockholm: ECDC; 2011. ISBN 978-92-9193-306-8 doi 10.2900/57509