Difference between revisions of "Category:Case-control studies"
Bosmana fem (talk | contribs) m |
Bosmana fem (talk | contribs) m (→FEM PAGE CONTRIBUTORS 2007) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
− | = | + | <div style="display: inline-block; width: 25%; vertical-align: top; border: 2px solid #000; background-color: #d7effc; padding: 10px; margin: 5px;"> |
+ | '''FEM PAGE CONTRIBUTORS 2007''' | ||
;Editors | ;Editors | ||
:Naomi Boxall | :Naomi Boxall | ||
Line 33: | Line 34: | ||
:Arnold Bosman | :Arnold Bosman | ||
:Naomi Boxall | :Naomi Boxall | ||
+ | </div> | ||
[[Category:Types of Study]] | [[Category:Types of Study]] |
Revision as of 18:35, 10 April 2023
In cohort studies, the denominator represents the exposure experience of the source population. If it is the exposure status as observed at the beginning of the cohort, we will compute a risk. If we allow for exposure to vary over time, we will compute a rate which considers the time spent by each individual in the exposed and unexposed cohorts over time. The main constraint in cohort studies is the necessity to collect information on exposure from large populations (to have denominators for the exposed and unexposed cohorts). We will see below that instead of collecting exposure information from the entire study population; we can use a sample of it to calculate or estimate the risk ratio or the rate ratio. In other words, instead of using the entire cohort denominator, we will use a sample of it. This sample, also frequently called a control group, is used to represent the exposure experience of the source population. The rationale behind using a sample of the denominator comes from the following formula for risk and rate ratio, which can alternatively be expressed as follows:
- For risk
- For rates
From the above formula, we already see that if we take an unbiased random sample of Ne and Nu, the ratio of exposed to unexposed (Ne/Nu) will not be modified. Therefore, the risk ratio will remain the same (Ne/Nu or a sample of it gives the same risk ratio if sampling is unbiased). The same applies if we use person-years at risk (PT).
Generally speaking, we have three major ways to select a sampled control group that reflect three ways to estimate exposure experience in the source population.
- Controls are selected from people who are still free of the disease at the end of the study period (Ne-Ce and Nu-Cu). We will call the related study design a traditional case-control study since it is the design most frequently used. The exposure measured reflects the exposure experience or status of people still free of disease at the end of the cohort.
- Controls are randomly selected from the population present (at risk) at the beginning of the study (Ne and Nu in the above graphic). The related study design is called a case-cohort study. The exposure measured reflects exposure status at the beginning of the cohort.
- Controls are selected proportionally to the person-time contributed by exposed and unexposed cohorts (PTe and PTu). The related study design is called a density case-control study. The exposure measured reflects the varying exposure of at-risk people along the cohort.
FEM PAGE CONTRIBUTORS 2007
- Editors
- Naomi Boxall
- Original Author
- Alain Moren
- Contributors
- Munir
- Sabrina Bacci
- Lisa Lazareck
- hccdejonge
- Arnold Bosman
- Naomi Boxall
Pages in category "Case-control studies"
The following 4 pages are in this category, out of 4 total.