Bosmana fem at 13:51, 12 April 2023

2023-04-12T13:51:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:51, 12 April 2023
Line 30:		Line 30:
	=References=		=References=
	<references/>		<references/>
			<div style="display: inline-block; width: 25%; vertical-align: top; border: 1px solid #000; background-color: #d7effc; padding: 10px; margin: 5px;">
			'''FEM PAGE CONTRIBUTORS 2007'''
			;Contributor
			:Arnold Bosman
			</div>
	[[Category:Selection bias and case-control studies]]		[[Category:Selection bias and case-control studies]]

Bosmana fem: /* References */

2023-04-12T13:46:18Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:46, 12 April 2023
Line 29:		Line 29:

	=References=		=References=
	</~~references~~>		<references/>

	[[Category:Selection bias and case-control studies]]		[[Category:Selection bias and case-control studies]]

Bosmana fem at 13:45, 12 April 2023

2023-04-12T13:45:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:45, 12 April 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
			This happens when the diagnostic approach is related to knowledge of the subject's prior exposure to a putative cause (e.g. taking a certain drug, being exposed in an outbreak etc <Ref name="Sackett"> Sackett DL. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis. 1979; 32(1-2):51-63.</ref>).

			Example: Suppose a case-control study is conducted to test if oral contraceptives (OC) are a risk factor for endometrial cancer. A group of cases and an equal number of controls are selected. Cases are selected at GP (family doctor) surgeries. Cases that use OC may be more likely to be offered to screen for endometrial cancer either systematically or because of a side-effect of OC (breakthrough bleeding). The chance of undertaking detection of endometrial cancer is, therefore, higher among OC users than among other cases, i.e. the use of OC may cause the search for endometrial cancer (by causing symptomless patients to bleed) rather than causing the cancer itself. The result is that a higher proportion of cases report using OC, with an overestimation of 'a, leading to an overestimation of the odds ratio.

			{\| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
			\|- style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left;"
			! Exposure
			! style="vertical-align:middle;" \| Cases of endometrial cancer
			! style="vertical-align:middle;" \| Controls
			! style="text-align:center; background-color:#F0F8FF;" \| OR
			\|- style="vertical-align:middle;"
			\| style="font-style:italic; text-align:left;" \| Uses OC
			\| a↑
			\| b
			\| style="background-color:#F0F8FF;" \| OR↑
			\|-
			\| style="vertical-align:middle; font-style:italic; text-align:left;" \| Doesn't use OC
			\| style="vertical-align:middle;" \| c
			\| style="vertical-align:middle;" \| d
			\| style="background-color:#F0F8FF; text-align:left;" \| reference
			\|- style="vertical-align:middle;"
			\| style="text-align:left;" \| Total
			\|
			\|
			\| style="vertical-align:bottom; text-align:left;" \|
			\|}

			Sackett <Ref name="Sackett"/> describes this example, where an innocent exposure may become a suspect if, rather than causing a disease, it causes a sign or symptom which precipitates a search for a disease, as 'unmasking (detection signal) bias'.

			=References=
			</references>

	[[Category:Selection bias and case-control studies]]		[[Category:Selection bias and case-control studies]]

Bosmana fem: Created page with " Category:Selection bias and case-control studies"

2023-03-22T21:32:33Z

Created page with " Category:Selection bias and case-control studies"

New page

[[Category:Selection bias and case-control studies]]

Diagnostic bias - Revision history

Bosmana fem at 13:51, 12 April 2023

Bosmana fem: /* References */

Bosmana fem at 13:45, 12 April 2023

Bosmana fem: Created page with " Category:Selection bias and case-control studies"